July 20, 2014 § Leave a comment
Does your story have good tread? (Or, “how to fill a blank page”.)
There you are, with your story mapped out. You have character sheets, an outline, endless notes and scribbles, and even some little doodles of your characters. You know your ending. Maybe, like me, you have a playlist of songs that fit, a soundtrack for your story. You are excited to do this.
You also have a blank page.
You put down a few words of that first draft, ignoring the snoring sounds from your internal editor. You stop. You get a glass of water, drink it, and think…
How do you get started on a story that you already love? You’ve put so much work into it already, so why doesn’t it just happen? Why can’t you get traction on the idea?
This morning over coffee, I pondered the idea of traction versus tread. When your boots or tires have worn out tread, you lose traction on the trail or road. Traction is what happens when you are already moving, awkward opening paragraphs behind you. So maybe the problem with starting a story isn’t that the concept doesn’t have traction — how can it, if the story isn’t in motion yet — but that your story needs better tread.
I am really, really trying to avoid the sole/soul pun. It hurts me.
What is story tread, then?
First off, what I mean my “story” is more than just the plot. It includes your plot, but it is also your purpose, your theme, your characters, your created world — in short, everything. It is the thing of beauty that you are bringing into the world. We sometimes say that a story is “plot driven” or “character driven.” You may benefit from deciding which kind of story you plan on telling, before you get started.
I would say that a plot driven story is one where your characters ride in the plot bus, all carried along together for the purpose of where that bus is going. On the plot bus, narrative points of view can change while the plot keeps a steady forward motion. A character driven story would be one with all the characters making their way on their own power, sometimes staying in a group, sometimes not. In that kind of story, it may be best to keep the point of view to one character’s observations.
Either way, you will want good tire tread and boot tread, because there are times in a first draft when the plot bus breaks down, and your characters will need to get out and walk to get to the end of the story. Vice-versa, you may have characters that want to make camp at a pleasant spot, suspecting you (rightly) of making their lives decidedly worse ahead, and the only way to get them moving is to put them on a trailer. If you have tread, every step you put down provides forward motion to the next one. Whether you are running through a fun page of dialog or tip-toeing through a delicate scene important to your theme, you want good footing.
Tread comes from depth and texture. Look at your characters’ histories. What wants and needs motivate each of them? Why is your main character taking this story journey? For that matter, why are you, the author, taking this story journey?
Is it for the scenic views, as in a memoir or a slice-of-life comedy? A friends-to-lovers romance benefits most from a journey that takes its time, lingering on scenes of interaction and savoring character dynamics. A fantastic, playful story like Alice in Wonderland is about the journey, with the conclusion being of lesser importance than the wonder of Wonderland. Brave New World is more about theme than the world or characters as individuals, or even what happens to them. (To tell the truth, I’ve read that book three times and can’t recall the conclusion of the plot at this moment.)
Scenery is the tread for those kinds of stories, so if you find yourself stalled, imagine any kind of scene you would like to happen in your story. Don’t worry about chronology or where it fits in with your story plans. Even if you don’t end up using the scene in your final draft, every scene you write deepens the grooves in your story and gives you more power to keep going. That unused scene might even develop into a free-standing short story.
Contrast a friends-to-lovers — a staple of fanfiction — story with a “fix-it,” the kind of story created expressly to give a character a happier ending or “correct” an unsatisfying element. In a fix-it story, the ending or series of ending moments through the story is the story’s reason for creation. A goal focused story, as the majority of stories are, is the kind most likely to get stuck in a mud puddle. For this kind of story, your characters are going to need a lot of agency, that personal power to get through the rough terrain. Even an empowered character can leave you slipping in the mud, unable to move forward in writing that character’s story. You’ll have to look deeper to create tread so that you can use that agency. What is it in your story that empowers that character? I don’t mean, “what is it in the character that empowers the character.” Specifically in your story, there will exist elements that your character uses.
For example, in Sherlock Holmes stories, Holmes observes everything, and Watson observes Holmes. Sherlock Holmes stories are, on the surface, about the solution of the mystery. How the detective gets to that solution is opaque to narrator Dr. John Watson. However, we love the stories because we get to watch Holmes work, through Watson’s observations. It’s no wonder that the most current interpretation of the stories, the BBC series in modern setting, has its focus as much (or more) on how John Watson and Sherlock Holmes affect each other than the reinterpretations of the mysteries.
Stephen King’s The Stand is a story that moves from the decimation of the country’s population toward a final “big boss” battle. The survivors of the superflu carry the story along a literal path and provide an answer to “What happens next?” through the gathering and separation of these survivors into groups. In a very different approach to monsters, Pixar’s Monsters University, a prequel to Monsters, Inc., knows that the audience expects the prequel to show how Mike and Sulley end up as best friends working at the scare factory. They become rivals shortly after first meeting, so of course, the story has to show how their animosity grows into a friendship that will last, a well-established trope.
A trope is essentially the opposite of tread. A trope is shallow, smooth with familiarity, a surface made slick by omnipresence. A trope isn’t necessarily bad. Used well, it provides resonance. But a trope by itself doesn’t give you any purchase.
What I see moving the story forward from one scene to the next in Monsters University is the motivation of what the characters think they want (to outdo each other, win the contest, etc) while making the audience think they know how the story will end. The “twist” in the end, which completely makes sense, comes from looking at the story from the author’s eye view. Remembering that the reader or viewer is a participant in your story can keep you going if you think about what kind of response or effect you want your reader to be feeling next. (Mwhahaha.)
One of my favorite Disney animated films has source material that gave the studio writers trouble because of a flat plot: Beauty & the Beast. In the original story, after the beauty is in the beast’s castle, only a series of dinners happens until she returns home to her sick father. To make a dynamic animated film engaging to young audiences, Disney had to come up with more things happening. A musical montage alone wasn’t enough on its own. A clear antagonist that was not also the love interest didn’t suffice. Still, this movie is all about the end goal of Belle and the Beast becoming realizing their love for each other. The physical transformation of the Beast back to human is denouement. (You know you’ve grown up on animated animal anthromorphism when, like Belle, you look askance at the rose-lipped human prince and wonder what was wrong with the Beast staying as he was.)
The musical montage of “Something There,” which takes the place of the static dinners/proposals and refusals of the original story, wouldn’t have much impact without the plot point just before it. Belle runs away, gets attacked by wolves, but is saved by the Beast who has gone after her. Because he sustains injuries in saving her life, Belle starts to rethink her impression of him.
Beauty & the Beast succeeds with forward motion because it is a story that clashes egocentric characters into conflict with each other. They individual goals dig into each other, providing traction. The Beast was cursed because he had no empathy for a poor crone seeking shelter, and until he is gentled by interacting with Belle, he continues to show possessiveness and selfishness. Sending Belle home to her father shows that he has learned to think of her happiness over his own. The villain, vain and cruel Gaston, is the most obviously egocentric. He fits comfortably into the driver’s seat of the plot bus when the time comes to “kill the beast!”
As a reader with my head in the clouds all the time, I identified with Belle, although at the time Belle seemed flawless. From an perspective of age, I can see that Belle, too, starts out with egocentricity in her nature. Although she does take her father’s place as the Beast’s prisoner, something that seems like a selfless act, it is as much fueled by her romanticism and desire for “so much more than her provincial life” as it is by her protectiveness of her father.
It’s interesting to note how in the stage musical, which I saw just a few years ago, Belle’s low regard for her “provincial” home and yearning for adventure become challenged by actually getting that adventure that takes her away from home. Once she becomes the Beast’s captive, in the added song “Home” — a significant character arc point — she realizes the weight of her actions. Her positive influence on the Beast is getting him to see that there is a bigger world outside his castle. The more recent Disney interpretation puts more emphasis on both of the characters growing as people.
I’m finding it helpful to think in terms of tread. It’s another way to talk about development, one in concrete, visual terms. In the early drafts of a story, you still have time to add depth to your tread. You will need to do some of this in editing, too, but you can’t edit a story that you haven’t written.
November 30, 2013 § Leave a comment
I am a creative speller. That is, I’m awful at spelling words correctly. My misspellings aren’t the common ones that get the dander up all over the internet, such as the “There, it’s your homophone” problem. There/they’re/their, it’s/its, and your/you’re (but not yore, for some reason) are the subject of many a rant. But not from me. I live in a glass house. If there was a believable way for me to misspell glass or house, I might have already done it. « Read the rest of this entry »